Skip to content
Theos Quantum Θ mark

Engagements

Engagement Catalogue

An engagement is a scoped piece of work with a written boundary, a named set of inputs, and a fixed list of artefacts you keep at the end of it. It is not a subscription, a licence or a standing retainer, and nothing in this catalogue runs continuously inside your estate. Each page states what the work covers, what it deliberately leaves out, and what you receive.

Grouped by category, in the order the work usually runs: inventory first, then a review of a single layer, then engineering, then the briefing that turns a position into decisions.

INVENTORY

Inventory

Establish what cryptography exists across the estate, where it lives, and how exposed each asset is. Everything else in this catalogue reads the register this produces.

REVIEW

Review

Go deep on one layer: transport and PKI, signing and identity, or key management. A review assumes the layer matters enough to warrant more than an inventory entry.

ENGINEERING

Engineering

Turn a scored register into an ordered programme of change, with a rollback at every step and the performance impact measured on your own workload first.

BRIEFING

Briefing

Take an exposure position into the room where budget is allocated, and leave with decisions, owners and a sequence an auditor can follow.

Scope comparison

Which engagement reads which surface

Five surfaces make up the estate we assess: transport and PKI, signing and identity, key management, the source tree and build chain, and the evidence pack an auditor or regulator receives. The grid below is derived from the catalogue itself, so it cannot drift out of step with the pages it summarises.

Ordered by the number of engagements covering the surface, highest first. Surfaces level on that count keep their catalogue order. Columns follow catalogue order.

Assemble the scope you need

The scope builder takes the engagements and estate surfaces you select and writes out the resulting scope: the artefacts you would receive, the inputs we would need, and the surfaces left explicitly outside it. It produces a scope summary and no quotation. If you would rather talk it through, a demo is the faster route.